@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Or simpler, non-fixed exist slit does not refer to fixed (dcms that are not cc)
...
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Or simpler, non-fixed exist slit does not refer to fixed (dcms that are not cc)
Does detuning not work 100% of the time in deleting all the harmonics? Is this why the second harmonic can still be seen in the detuning 0.074 degrees picture (see the "detuning_tests" folder)?
Does detuning not work 100% of the time in deleting all the harmonics? Is this why the second harmonic can still be seen in the detuning 0.074 degrees picture (see the "detuning_tests" folder)?
What percentage is to be detuned? If a certain percentage of the full width half maximum to detune for certain ranges of energy is chosen, won't the intensity jump problem that happens with the different coatings reappear?
What percentage is to be detuned? If a certain percentage of the full width half maximum to detune for certain ranges of energy is chosen, won't the intensity jump problem that happens with the different coatings reappear?
-[x] Answer: The beamlines use DCMs with non-fixed exit. Detuning is done in the simulation now. Refer to [glitches v2](../v2)
-[x] Answer: The beamlines use DCMs with non-fixed exit. Detuning is done in the simulation now. Refer to [glitches v2](../..v2)
#### 4 Digitizing the ssrl-glitch db plot data
#### 4 Digitizing the ssrl-glitch db plot data
...
@@ -87,13 +87,13 @@ And the view from above with the z axis directed towards the screen (direct trih
...
@@ -87,13 +87,13 @@ And the view from above with the z axis directed towards the screen (direct trih
What is done in reality?
What is done in reality?
-[x] Answer: The naive choice is done. This is what is simulated now in [v2](../v2)
-[x] Answer: The naive choice is done. This is what is simulated now in [v2](../..v2)
#### 7 cif2hkl (DONE)
#### 7 cif2hkl (DONE)
Re-run the simulations for a larger energy range with the new updated cif2hkl version perhaps. This is important for the white source (4 to 40 keV), cif2hkl should run with this energy range not just the default one to generate the correct Si.lau file.
Re-run the simulations for a larger energy range with the new updated cif2hkl version perhaps. This is important for the white source (4 to 40 keV), cif2hkl should run with this energy range not just the default one to generate the correct Si.lau file.
-[x] Answer: New cif2hkl made a new Si.lau for the energy range 4-40 keV in [v2](../v2).
-[x] Answer: New cif2hkl made a new Si.lau for the energy range 4-40 keV in [v2](../../v2).