One must be careful with zooming too much on the ssrl data because the digitalized plots are done from a picture so the positions of the ssrl glitches can shift when zoomed in on too much (see the [v1 documentation](https://gitlab.synchrotron-soleil.fr/grades/beamlines/-/tree/main/glitches) and [questions and improvements](../questions) folder for more information on the problem).
One must be careful with zooming too much on the ssrl data because the digitalized plots are done from a picture so the positions of the ssrl glitches can shift when zoomed in on too much (see the [v1 documentation](https://gitlab.synchrotron-soleil.fr/grades/beamlines/-/tree/main/v1/glitches) and [questions and improvements](../v1/questions) folder for more information on the problem).
The glitches end up at the correct places (more or less), same as in version 1. But the intensity deviations differ in value. Hopefully once the correct parameters for the `standard` simulation are found, the McXtrace intensity deviations will be closer to ssrl's.
The glitches end up at the correct places (more or less), same as in version 1. But the intensity deviations differ in value. Hopefully once the correct parameters for the `standard` simulation are found, the McXtrace intensity deviations will be closer to ssrl's.
