Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 6e3798b9 authored by PADOVANI's avatar PADOVANI
Browse files

Update README.md

parent d7d2e742
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
When comparing McXtrace and the ssrl glitch database, glitches are found at the same positions for the same crystals and orientations.
Work still needs to be done to get the same intensity deviation with McXtrace compared to the ssrl glitch database. To do so the improvements listed in [questions and improvements](questions) will be implemented, mainly the creation of an ssrl beamline ([see version 2](v2)).
Work still needs to be done to get the same intensity deviation with McXtrace compared to the ssrl glitch database. To do so the improvements listed in [questions and improvements](questions) will be implemented, mainly the creation of an ssrl beamline ([see version 2](glitches/v2)).
Simulations done in this first version might also be re-run with some of the improvements listed (correct Si.lau file, correct crystal orientations etc ...)
For the end user's ease of use, another objective is to run all the logic from a python package. [McStasScript](https://github.com/PaNOSC-ViNYL/McStasScript) would be used to abstract away McXtrace. Of course the native McXtrace way to run the logic would also still be a possibility.
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment